Coming Up
He's Made Up His Mind
African Boy Disavows Madonna Adoption, Holds Out For Brangelina
Friday, October 13, 2006
The North Korean Landslide
Results of yesterday's Webpoll.
Favorite Title For Kim Jong-Il
Kaboom Daddy (2) 18.18%
K-Threat (7) 63.64%
Il B. Sure (2) 18.18%
Thanks to everyone who voted. I'll be forwarding your responses to Pyongyang shortly.
Results of yesterday's Webpoll.
Favorite Title For Kim Jong-Il
Kaboom Daddy (2) 18.18%
K-Threat (7) 63.64%
Il B. Sure (2) 18.18%
Thanks to everyone who voted. I'll be forwarding your responses to Pyongyang shortly.
Thursday, October 12, 2006
Question Of The Day
What's your favorite title for North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Il? Take our poll.
Kim Jong-Il
Your responses will be closely monitored by Asian meteorologists.
What's your favorite title for North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Il? Take our poll.
Kim Jong-Il
Your responses will be closely monitored by Asian meteorologists.
Monday, October 09, 2006
A Look At This Week's Newsstand
Today was a federal holiday, so most US subscribers to the major newsweeklies will have to wait another day before receiving the latest issues. The covers, however, have been online since early Sunday morning, and have already been major blog-bait.
The dominant story this week: Foleygate.
This is Newsweek's cover. Very clever, I think - especially that frowny-face smiley in place of the 'O'. Though, for the sake of historical accuracy, they should've used an authentic AIM emoticon:
A face that looks strikingly like Mark Foley anyway.
This is Time depicting "the end of the Republican revolution" with the hindquarters of an elephant, the party's traditional symbol. Again, a very arresting, very apt image.
But not the original cover. I have a friend at Time who told me they toyed around with a slightly different concept before settling on the elephant rear:
Now that's a memorable cover. But I guess the Time folks thought it would too disturbing for middle America. Pity.
The Foley scandal is one of those unique political soap operas that grabs the attention of publications that don't normally provide extensive coverage of national affairs. A magazine like People, for instance - which happens to have a major scoop related to this story:
Continuing the elephant theme, even National Geographic has a cover piece that seems connected to the Foley scandal:
What genius will next week's mags bring? Stay tuned.
Today was a federal holiday, so most US subscribers to the major newsweeklies will have to wait another day before receiving the latest issues. The covers, however, have been online since early Sunday morning, and have already been major blog-bait.
The dominant story this week: Foleygate.
This is Newsweek's cover. Very clever, I think - especially that frowny-face smiley in place of the 'O'. Though, for the sake of historical accuracy, they should've used an authentic AIM emoticon:
A face that looks strikingly like Mark Foley anyway.
This is Time depicting "the end of the Republican revolution" with the hindquarters of an elephant, the party's traditional symbol. Again, a very arresting, very apt image.
But not the original cover. I have a friend at Time who told me they toyed around with a slightly different concept before settling on the elephant rear:
Now that's a memorable cover. But I guess the Time folks thought it would too disturbing for middle America. Pity.
The Foley scandal is one of those unique political soap operas that grabs the attention of publications that don't normally provide extensive coverage of national affairs. A magazine like People, for instance - which happens to have a major scoop related to this story:
Continuing the elephant theme, even National Geographic has a cover piece that seems connected to the Foley scandal:
What genius will next week's mags bring? Stay tuned.
Labels:
aim,
elephants,
magazines,
mark foley,
newsweek,
people,
republicans,
scandal,
time
Saturday, October 07, 2006
Saturday Matinee: Swimming Cats!
It's the weekend - what better time to catch a movie? Direct from soon-to-be Google subsidiary YouTube - man's greatest-ever invention - it's another edition of Saturday Matinee.
Tonight: a visit to a cat swimming school, as seen in Mr. Mike's Mondo Video.
Don't try that at home.
It's the weekend - what better time to catch a movie? Direct from soon-to-be Google subsidiary YouTube - man's greatest-ever invention - it's another edition of Saturday Matinee.
Tonight: a visit to a cat swimming school, as seen in Mr. Mike's Mondo Video.
Don't try that at home.
Labels:
cats,
michael o'donoghue,
saturday matinee,
swimming,
youtube
Friday, October 06, 2006
Thursday, October 05, 2006
Startling New Evidence Of A "State Of Denial"
By Special Guest Blogger, Bob Woodward
In my new book, State Of Denial, I chronicle the Bush administration's tragic failures in Iraq. As usual in my investigative work, I conducted hundreds of interviews in a two-year-long quest to learn the truth, as both current and former government officials see it. But not all of these discussions made it into print. Only now can I reveal the content of some of my exchanges, such as an alarming conversation I had in April of this year.
More or less by accident, I happened to make the acquaintance of a longtime Republican office-holder, a member of the House leadership who had loyally supported the president. But this GOP stalwart was beginning to have serious reservations about the administration's conduct of Iraq policy. The source insisted on speaking to me exclusively through communications over the Internet, and would identify himself only by his AOL Instant Messenger username "Maf54." What he would reveal in these conversations shocked me.
Over the course of our two-hour chat, "54" repeatedly made his concern explicit: the Administration was badly failing the troops. Like his colleagues, he had dutifully voted for war appropriations requests, even when he felt there were far more pressing matters immediately at hand. But now his doubts - bubbling just beneath the surface for years - had grown, to the point where, in his words, they had "reached rock."
The Republican told me he had initiated contact with many young servicemen, and to a person, they expressed unease. He had tried to reach out to numerous others, but indicated that several seemed so disillusioned by the government's conduct of the Iraq mission that they refused to speak with him, either online or when he offered to visit them in person. This situation so profoundly saddened him that he recalled multiple occasions where he literally welled up at the plight of these brave young men - some just barely out of high school - who had signed up to serve their country.
As a man who took special interest in the personal security of American youth, he was particularly incensed that so many in the military seemed to lack the proper equipment to protect their bodies, and had been forced to rely heavily on their "great legs running" to escape physical harm. He told me shocking stories of soldiers so desperate to raise cash for body armor that they consented to selling lurid photos of themselves to older men on the Internet. He was unsure of how common this practice was but committed himself to doing the research necessary to bring this shame to public light in future congressional hearings.
After this portion of our talks, "Maf54" signed off abruptly. I would not speak to him again, though a Washington Post researcher later bumped into him while browsing the electronic games section of a DC-area Sam Goody's.
The source has now been publicly identified as a former Florida congressman.
You will have the opportunity to read the complete transcripts of my conversations with "Maf54" in future printings of State Of Denial, and more transcripts will appear in the paperback edition of State Of Denial, which will be released sometime next year.
By Special Guest Blogger, Bob Woodward
In my new book, State Of Denial, I chronicle the Bush administration's tragic failures in Iraq. As usual in my investigative work, I conducted hundreds of interviews in a two-year-long quest to learn the truth, as both current and former government officials see it. But not all of these discussions made it into print. Only now can I reveal the content of some of my exchanges, such as an alarming conversation I had in April of this year.
More or less by accident, I happened to make the acquaintance of a longtime Republican office-holder, a member of the House leadership who had loyally supported the president. But this GOP stalwart was beginning to have serious reservations about the administration's conduct of Iraq policy. The source insisted on speaking to me exclusively through communications over the Internet, and would identify himself only by his AOL Instant Messenger username "Maf54." What he would reveal in these conversations shocked me.
Over the course of our two-hour chat, "54" repeatedly made his concern explicit: the Administration was badly failing the troops. Like his colleagues, he had dutifully voted for war appropriations requests, even when he felt there were far more pressing matters immediately at hand. But now his doubts - bubbling just beneath the surface for years - had grown, to the point where, in his words, they had "reached rock."
The Republican told me he had initiated contact with many young servicemen, and to a person, they expressed unease. He had tried to reach out to numerous others, but indicated that several seemed so disillusioned by the government's conduct of the Iraq mission that they refused to speak with him, either online or when he offered to visit them in person. This situation so profoundly saddened him that he recalled multiple occasions where he literally welled up at the plight of these brave young men - some just barely out of high school - who had signed up to serve their country.
As a man who took special interest in the personal security of American youth, he was particularly incensed that so many in the military seemed to lack the proper equipment to protect their bodies, and had been forced to rely heavily on their "great legs running" to escape physical harm. He told me shocking stories of soldiers so desperate to raise cash for body armor that they consented to selling lurid photos of themselves to older men on the Internet. He was unsure of how common this practice was but committed himself to doing the research necessary to bring this shame to public light in future congressional hearings.
After this portion of our talks, "Maf54" signed off abruptly. I would not speak to him again, though a Washington Post researcher later bumped into him while browsing the electronic games section of a DC-area Sam Goody's.
The source has now been publicly identified as a former Florida congressman.
You will have the opportunity to read the complete transcripts of my conversations with "Maf54" in future printings of State Of Denial, and more transcripts will appear in the paperback edition of State Of Denial, which will be released sometime next year.
I Resign
Clearly, the people have spoken:
Too Much Foley?
Yea (3) 42.86%
Nay (2) 28.57%
Don't stop, I'm almost there (2) 28.57%
Those are the results of Wednesday's Webpoll. So I hereby resign from non-stop coverage of the Foley saga.
I make this decision with a heavy heart, with full knowledge that there are things like this out there:
I know the recovery process won't be easy. But I have confidence the Lomblog reader community - or 43% of it - will be with me every step along the way.
For those of you that voted differently, let's remember that special time we shared, when a fair-haired Congressman with a twinkle in his eyes and laptop in lockdown captured our fancy and wouldn't let go, until we were forced to report him to Rep. John Shimkus, head of the House Page Board.
Rep. Mark Foley
Memo-ries...
I swear on the soul of John Walsh the next post won't even have the word "Foley" in it!
Clearly, the people have spoken:
Too Much Foley?
Yea (3) 42.86%
Nay (2) 28.57%
Don't stop, I'm almost there (2) 28.57%
Those are the results of Wednesday's Webpoll. So I hereby resign from non-stop coverage of the Foley saga.
I make this decision with a heavy heart, with full knowledge that there are things like this out there:
I know the recovery process won't be easy. But I have confidence the Lomblog reader community - or 43% of it - will be with me every step along the way.
For those of you that voted differently, let's remember that special time we shared, when a fair-haired Congressman with a twinkle in his eyes and laptop in lockdown captured our fancy and wouldn't let go, until we were forced to report him to Rep. John Shimkus, head of the House Page Board.
Rep. Mark Foley
Memo-ries...
I swear on the soul of John Walsh the next post won't even have the word "Foley" in it!
Labels:
bush,
congress,
john walsh,
mark foley,
meta,
rehab,
republicans,
scandal,
webpoll
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)